Topping, SMUCKER'S MAGIC SHELL vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Topping, SMUCKER'S MAGIC SHELL
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Topping, SMUCKER'S MAGIC SHELL | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 609 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Topping, SMUCKER'S MAGIC SHELL has 408% more |
| Protein | 2.94 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 33% more |
| Carbs | 50.07 g ★ | 21.3 g | Topping, SMUCKER'S MAGIC SHELL has 135% more |
| Fat | 44.1 g | 1.92 g ★ | Topping, SMUCKER'S MAGIC SHELL has 2197% more |
| Fiber | 2.9 g ★ | 2.8 g | Topping, SMUCKER'S MAGIC SHELL has 4% more |
| Sugar | 47.06 g | 0.87 g ★ | Topping, SMUCKER'S MAGIC SHELL has 5309% more |
| Sodium | 29 mg | 7 mg ★ | Topping, SMUCKER'S MAGIC SHELL has 314% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Potassium | 73 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 58% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.