Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean only, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean only, raw
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean only, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean only, raw has 3% more |
| Protein | 20.18 g ★ | 4.4 g | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean only, raw has 359% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.65 g | 1.92 g ★ | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean only, raw has 142% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 112 mg | 7 mg ★ | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean only, raw has 1500% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
| Iron | 1 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 33% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.