Veal, shank (fore and hind), separable lean only, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, shank (fore and hind), separable lean only, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, shank (fore and hind), separable lean only, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 108 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 10% more |
| Protein | 19.28 g ★ | 4.4 g | Veal, shank (fore and hind), separable lean only, raw has 338% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.83 g | 1.92 g ★ | Veal, shank (fore and hind), separable lean only, raw has 47% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 85 mg | 7 mg ★ | Veal, shank (fore and hind), separable lean only, raw has 1114% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg ★ | 17 mg | Veal, shank (fore and hind), separable lean only, raw has 18% more |
| Iron | 0.76 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 49% more |
| Potassium | 316 mg ★ | 172 mg | Veal, shank (fore and hind), separable lean only, raw has 84% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.