Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native)
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 282 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 71% more |
| Protein | 16.3 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 47% more |
| Fat | 24.1 g | 3.57 g ★ | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 575% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 100% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 100% more |
| Iron | 9.4 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 804% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.