Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native)
2 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
| Nutrient | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 282 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 84% more |
| Protein | 16.3 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 34% more |
| Fat | 24.1 g | 5.28 g ★ | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 356% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 100% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 100% more |
| Iron | 9.4 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 1989% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.