Whale, bowhead, skin and subcutaneous fat (muktuk) (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Whale, bowhead, skin and subcutaneous fat (muktuk) (Alaska Native)
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Whale, bowhead, skin and subcutaneous fat (muktuk) (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 465 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Whale, bowhead, skin and subcutaneous fat (muktuk) (Alaska Native) has 288% more |
| Protein | 12.6 g ★ | 4.4 g | Whale, bowhead, skin and subcutaneous fat (muktuk) (Alaska Native) has 186% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 46.1 g | 1.92 g ★ | Whale, bowhead, skin and subcutaneous fat (muktuk) (Alaska Native) has 2301% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.