Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native)
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 20 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 83% more |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 14% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.5 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 74% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 656 mg | 7 mg ★ | Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native) has 9271% more |
| Calcium | 47 mg ★ | 17 mg | Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native) has 176% more |
| Iron | 3.3 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native) has 121% more |
| Potassium | 102 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 41% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.