Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native)
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 20 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Protein | 3.8 g ★ | 2.01 g | Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native) has 89% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native) has 233% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 656 mg | 36 mg ★ | Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native) has 1722% more |
| Calcium | 47 mg ★ | 38 mg | Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native) has 24% more |
| Iron | 3.3 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Ascidians (tunughnak) (Alaska Native) has 378% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 102 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.