Babyfood, apples with ham, strained vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, apples with ham, strained
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, apples with ham, strained | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 62 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 31% more |
| Protein | 2.6 g ★ | 2.01 g | Babyfood, apples with ham, strained has 29% more |
| Carbs | 10.9 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.15 g ★ | Babyfood, apples with ham, strained has 500% more |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sugar | 7.98 g | 6.48 g ★ | Babyfood, apples with ham, strained has 23% more |
| Sodium | 9 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Iron | 0.3 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 120 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.