Barley, hulled vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Barley, hulled
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Barley, hulled | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 354 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Barley, hulled has 293% more |
| Protein | 12.48 g ★ | 2.01 g | Barley, hulled has 521% more |
| Carbs | 73.48 g ★ | 20.71 g | Barley, hulled has 255% more |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Barley, hulled has 1433% more |
| Fiber | 17.3 g ★ | 3.3 g | Barley, hulled has 424% more |
| Sugar | 0.8 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Sodium | 12 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Calcium | 33 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Iron | 3.6 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Barley, hulled has 422% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 452 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 5% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.