Beef, chopped, cured, smoked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chopped, cured, smoked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chopped, cured, smoked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, chopped, cured, smoked has 48% more |
| Protein | 20.19 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, chopped, cured, smoked has 904% more |
| Carbs | 1.86 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 91% more |
| Fat | 4.42 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, chopped, cured, smoked has 2847% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1258 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beef, chopped, cured, smoked has 3394% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 2.85 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, chopped, cured, smoked has 313% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 377 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.