Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 560 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 367% more |
| Protein | 7.9 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 80% more |
| Carbs | 3.39 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 84% more |
| Fat | 57.22 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 2880% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 257% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
| Iron | 1.18 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 21% more |
| Potassium | 125 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 27% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.