Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 560 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 522% more |
| Protein | 7.9 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 293% more |
| Carbs | 3.39 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Fat | 57.22 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 38047% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 31% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Iron | 1.18 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 71% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 125 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.