Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, cooked, boiled vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, cooked, boiled
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, cooked, boiled | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 126 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, cooked, boiled has 5% more |
| Protein | 24.21 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, cooked, boiled has 450% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.26 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, cooked, boiled has 70% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 32 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, cooked, boiled has 357% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Iron | 1.78 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, cooked, boiled has 19% more |
| Potassium | 193 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, cooked, boiled has 12% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.