Beef, retail cuts, separable fat, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, retail cuts, separable fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, retail cuts, separable fat, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 674 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 649% more |
| Protein | 8.21 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 308% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 70.89 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 47160% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 26 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
| Calcium | 26 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Iron | 0.72 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 4% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 96 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.