Beets, cooked, boiled, drained vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beets, cooked, boiled, drained
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Beets, cooked, boiled, drained | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 44 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 51% more |
| Protein | 1.68 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 16% more |
| Carbs | 9.96 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Fat | 0.18 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beets, cooked, boiled, drained has 20% more |
| Fiber | 2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sugar | 7.96 g | 6.48 g ★ | Beets, cooked, boiled, drained has 23% more |
| Sodium | 77 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beets, cooked, boiled, drained has 114% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Iron | 0.79 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beets, cooked, boiled, drained has 14% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Potassium | 305 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.