Beverages, AMBER, hard cider vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beverages, AMBER, hard cider
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Beverages, AMBER, hard cider | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 56 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 38% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Carbs | 5.92 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Fat | 0 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 5.92 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 9% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Iron | 0.06 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 91% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.3 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Potassium | 54 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.