Blueberries, wild, raw (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Blueberries, wild, raw (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Blueberries, wild, raw (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 61 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 49% more |
| Protein | 1.22 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 72% more |
| Carbs | 12.31 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 42% more |
| Fat | 0.76 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 60% more |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 7% more |
| Sugar | 6.46 g | 0.87 g ★ | Blueberries, wild, raw (Alaska Native) has 643% more |
| Sodium | 6 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 14% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 24% more |
| Iron | 0.37 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 75% more |
| Vitamin C | 18.3 mg ★ | 0 mg | Blueberries, wild, raw (Alaska Native) has 0% more |
| Potassium | 75 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 56% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.