Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock)
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 19% more |
| Protein | 21.44 g ★ | 4.4 g | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 387% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.3 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 32% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg | 7 mg ★ | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 514% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 82% more |
| Iron | 2.61 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 75% more |
| Potassium | 355 mg ★ | 172 mg | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 106% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.