Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 8% more |
| Protein | 21.44 g ★ | 2.01 g | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 967% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 767% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg | 36 mg ★ | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 19% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Iron | 2.61 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 278% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 355 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.