Butterbur, canned vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Butterbur, canned
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Butterbur, canned | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 3 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Protein | 0.11 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Carbs | 0.38 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more |
| Fat | 0.13 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 34 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 11% more |
| Iron | 0.63 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 9% more |
| Vitamin C | 11.9 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Potassium | 12 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.