Butterbur, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Butterbur, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Butterbur, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 8 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 91% more |
| Protein | 0.23 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Carbs | 2.16 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Fat | 0.02 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 240 mg | 36 mg ★ | Butterbur, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 567% more |
| Calcium | 59 mg ★ | 38 mg | Butterbur, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 55% more |
| Iron | 0.1 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Vitamin C | 18.9 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 4% more |
| Potassium | 354 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.