Cabbage, napa, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Cabbage, napa, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Cabbage, napa, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 12 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Carbs | 2.23 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Fat | 0.17 g | 0.15 g ★ | Cabbage, napa, cooked has 13% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 11 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Calcium | 29 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
| Iron | 0.74 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Cabbage, napa, cooked has 7% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Potassium | 87 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.