Carambola, (starfruit), raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Carambola, (starfruit), raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Carambola, (starfruit), raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 31 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Protein | 1.04 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Carbs | 6.73 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Fat | 0.33 g | 0.15 g ★ | Carambola, (starfruit), raw has 120% more |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 15% more |
| Sugar | 3.98 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Iron | 0.08 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Vitamin C | 34.4 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Carambola, (starfruit), raw has 76% more |
| Potassium | 133 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.