Carissa, (natal-plum), raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Carissa, (natal-plum), raw
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Carissa, (natal-plum), raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 62 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 31% more |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Carbs | 13.63 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Carissa, (natal-plum), raw has 767% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 3 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Iron | 1.31 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Carissa, (natal-plum), raw has 90% more |
| Vitamin C | 38 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Carissa, (natal-plum), raw has 94% more |
| Potassium | 260 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.