Chili con carne with beans, canned entree vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Chili con carne with beans, canned entree
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Chili con carne with beans, canned entree | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 11% more |
| Protein | 5.8 g ★ | 4.4 g | Chili con carne with beans, canned entree has 32% more |
| Carbs | 13.1 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 38% more |
| Fat | 3.47 g | 1.92 g ★ | Chili con carne with beans, canned entree has 81% more |
| Fiber | 3.3 g ★ | 2.8 g | Chili con carne with beans, canned entree has 18% more |
| Sugar | 1.87 g | 0.87 g ★ | Chili con carne with beans, canned entree has 115% more |
| Sodium | 449 mg | 7 mg ★ | Chili con carne with beans, canned entree has 6314% more |
| Calcium | 33 mg ★ | 17 mg | Chili con carne with beans, canned entree has 94% more |
| Iron | 1.34 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 10% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg ★ | 0 mg | Chili con carne with beans, canned entree has 0% more |
| Potassium | 264 mg ★ | 172 mg | Chili con carne with beans, canned entree has 53% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.