Chili with beans, microwavable bowls vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Chili with beans, microwavable bowls
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Chili with beans, microwavable bowls | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Chili with beans, microwavable bowls has 11% more |
| Protein | 5.85 g ★ | 2.01 g | Chili with beans, microwavable bowls has 191% more |
| Carbs | 10.88 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Fat | 3.68 g | 0.15 g ★ | Chili with beans, microwavable bowls has 2353% more |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 12% more |
| Sugar | 1.84 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Sodium | 385 mg | 36 mg ★ | Chili with beans, microwavable bowls has 969% more |
| Calcium | 34 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 11% more |
| Iron | 1.13 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Chili with beans, microwavable bowls has 64% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.8 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Potassium | 245 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.