Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
Nutrient Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 20 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more
Protein 1.64 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more
Carbs 4.31 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more
Fat 0.09 g 0.15 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more
Fiber 2.3 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more
Sugar 2.01 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more
Sodium 289 mg 36 mg Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 703% more
Calcium 69 mg 38 mg Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 82% more
Iron 3.74 mg 0.69 mg Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 442% more
Vitamin C 23.9 mg 19.6 mg Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 22% more
Potassium 569 mg 475 mg Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 20% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.