Chrysanthemum, garland, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Chrysanthemum, garland, raw
8 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
3 wins
| Nutrient | Chrysanthemum, garland, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 24 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 80% more |
| Protein | 3.36 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 24% more |
| Carbs | 3.02 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 86% more |
| Fat | 0.56 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Fiber | 3 g ★ | 2.8 g | Chrysanthemum, garland, raw has 7% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 118 mg | 7 mg ★ | Chrysanthemum, garland, raw has 1586% more |
| Calcium | 117 mg ★ | 17 mg | Chrysanthemum, garland, raw has 588% more |
| Iron | 2.29 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Chrysanthemum, garland, raw has 54% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | Chrysanthemum, garland, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 567 mg ★ | 172 mg | Chrysanthemum, garland, raw has 230% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.