Clif Z bar vs Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Clif Z bar
8 wins
🏆
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
3 wins
| Nutrient | Clif Z bar | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 416 kcal | 130 kcal ★ | Clif Z bar has 220% more |
| Protein | 5.55 g ★ | 2.69 g | Clif Z bar has 106% more |
| Carbs | 74.72 g ★ | 28.17 g | Clif Z bar has 165% more |
| Fat | 9.72 g | 0.28 g ★ | Clif Z bar has 3371% more |
| Fiber | 8.3 g ★ | 0.4 g | Clif Z bar has 1975% more |
| Sugar | 30.56 g | 0.05 g ★ | Clif Z bar has 61020% more |
| Sodium | 375 mg ★ | 382 mg | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 2% more |
| Calcium | 444 mg ★ | 10 mg | Clif Z bar has 4340% more |
| Iron | 2.7 mg ★ | 0.2 mg | Clif Z bar has 1250% more |
| Vitamin C | 39.1 mg ★ | 0 mg | Clif Z bar has 0% more |
| Potassium | 333 mg ★ | 35 mg | Clif Z bar has 851% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.