Fish, mackerel, Pacific and jack, mixed species, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, mackerel, Pacific and jack, mixed species, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, mackerel, Pacific and jack, mixed species, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 158 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, mackerel, Pacific and jack, mixed species, raw has 32% more |
| Protein | 20.07 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, mackerel, Pacific and jack, mixed species, raw has 356% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 7.89 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, mackerel, Pacific and jack, mixed species, raw has 311% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 86 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, mackerel, Pacific and jack, mixed species, raw has 1129% more |
| Calcium | 23 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, mackerel, Pacific and jack, mixed species, raw has 35% more |
| Iron | 1.16 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 22% more |
| Vitamin C | 2 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, mackerel, Pacific and jack, mixed species, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 406 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, mackerel, Pacific and jack, mixed species, raw has 136% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.