Fish, mackerel, spanish, cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, mackerel, spanish, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, mackerel, spanish, cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 158 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, mackerel, spanish, cooked, dry heat has 32% more |
| Protein | 23.59 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, mackerel, spanish, cooked, dry heat has 436% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 6.32 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, mackerel, spanish, cooked, dry heat has 229% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 66 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, mackerel, spanish, cooked, dry heat has 843% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 24% more |
| Iron | 0.74 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 50% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.6 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, mackerel, spanish, cooked, dry heat has 0% more |
| Potassium | 554 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, mackerel, spanish, cooked, dry heat has 222% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.