Fish, pike, northern, cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, pike, northern, cooked, dry heat
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, pike, northern, cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 113 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
| Protein | 24.69 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, pike, northern, cooked, dry heat has 461% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.88 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 54% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 49 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, pike, northern, cooked, dry heat has 600% more |
| Calcium | 73 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, pike, northern, cooked, dry heat has 329% more |
| Iron | 0.71 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 52% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.8 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, pike, northern, cooked, dry heat has 0% more |
| Potassium | 331 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, pike, northern, cooked, dry heat has 92% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.