Fish, pike, northern, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, pike, northern, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, pike, northern, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 2% more |
| Protein | 19.26 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, pike, northern, raw has 858% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.69 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, pike, northern, raw has 360% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 39 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, pike, northern, raw has 8% more |
| Calcium | 57 mg ★ | 38 mg | Fish, pike, northern, raw has 50% more |
| Iron | 0.55 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.8 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Potassium | 259 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.