Fish, shark, mixed species, cooked, batter-dipped and fried vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, shark, mixed species, cooked, batter-dipped and fried
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, shark, mixed species, cooked, batter-dipped and fried | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 228 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, shark, mixed species, cooked, batter-dipped and fried has 90% more |
| Protein | 18.62 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, shark, mixed species, cooked, batter-dipped and fried has 323% more |
| Carbs | 6.39 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 70% more |
| Fat | 13.82 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, shark, mixed species, cooked, batter-dipped and fried has 620% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 122 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, shark, mixed species, cooked, batter-dipped and fried has 1643% more |
| Calcium | 50 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, shark, mixed species, cooked, batter-dipped and fried has 194% more |
| Iron | 1.11 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 26% more |
| Potassium | 155 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 10% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.