Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
Nutrient Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 347 kcal 90 kcal Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar has 286% more
Protein 7.72 g 2.01 g Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar has 284% more
Carbs 51.68 g 20.71 g Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar has 150% more
Fat 14.19 g 0.15 g Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar has 9360% more
Fiber 5.2 g 3.3 g Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar has 58% more
Sugar 27.03 g 6.48 g Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar has 317% more
Sodium 260 mg 36 mg Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar has 622% more
Calcium 1209 mg 38 mg Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar has 3082% more
Iron 2.21 mg 0.69 mg Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar has 220% more
Vitamin C 42.5 mg 19.6 mg Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Almond Snack Bar has 117% more
Potassium 0 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.