Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
Nutrient Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 325 kcal 90 kcal Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar has 261% more
Protein 6.21 g 2.01 g Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar has 209% more
Carbs 57.87 g 20.71 g Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar has 179% more
Fat 9.27 g 0.15 g Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar has 6080% more
Fiber 4.6 g 3.3 g Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar has 39% more
Sugar 33.4 g 6.48 g Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar has 415% more
Sodium 260 mg 36 mg Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar has 622% more
Calcium 1207 mg 38 mg Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar has 3076% more
Iron 1.88 mg 0.69 mg Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar has 172% more
Vitamin C 42.4 mg 19.6 mg Formulated bar, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA, Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar has 116% more
Potassium 0 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.