Frankfurter, pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Frankfurter, pork
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Frankfurter, pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 269 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Frankfurter, pork has 199% more |
| Protein | 12.81 g ★ | 2.01 g | Frankfurter, pork has 537% more |
| Carbs | 0.28 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Fat | 23.68 g | 0.15 g ★ | Frankfurter, pork has 15687% more |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 816 mg | 36 mg ★ | Frankfurter, pork has 2167% more |
| Calcium | 267 mg ★ | 38 mg | Frankfurter, pork has 603% more |
| Iron | 3.7 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Frankfurter, pork has 436% more |
| Vitamin C | 2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Potassium | 264 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.