HORMEL, Cure 81 Ham vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
HORMEL, Cure 81 Ham
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | HORMEL, Cure 81 Ham | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | HORMEL, Cure 81 Ham has 18% more |
| Protein | 18.43 g ★ | 2.01 g | HORMEL, Cure 81 Ham has 817% more |
| Carbs | 0.21 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Fat | 3.59 g | 0.15 g ★ | HORMEL, Cure 81 Ham has 2293% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1038 mg | 36 mg ★ | HORMEL, Cure 81 Ham has 2783% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Iron | 0.8 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | HORMEL, Cure 81 Ham has 16% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Potassium | 319 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.