Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt
8 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
3 wins
| Nutrient | Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 37 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
| Protein | 3.68 g ★ | 2.01 g | Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 83% more |
| Carbs | 7.29 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 33% more |
| Fiber | 2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sugar | 1 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Sodium | 11 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Calcium | 211 mg ★ | 38 mg | Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 455% more |
| Iron | 3.14 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 355% more |
| Vitamin C | 33 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 68% more |
| Potassium | 550 mg ★ | 475 mg | Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 16% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.