Jute, potherb, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Jute, potherb, raw
8 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
3 wins
| Nutrient | Jute, potherb, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 34 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
| Protein | 4.65 g ★ | 2.01 g | Jute, potherb, raw has 131% more |
| Carbs | 5.8 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Fat | 0.25 g | 0.15 g ★ | Jute, potherb, raw has 67% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 8 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Calcium | 208 mg ★ | 38 mg | Jute, potherb, raw has 447% more |
| Iron | 4.76 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Jute, potherb, raw has 590% more |
| Vitamin C | 37 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Jute, potherb, raw has 89% more |
| Potassium | 559 mg ★ | 475 mg | Jute, potherb, raw has 18% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.