KFC, biscuit vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
KFC, biscuit
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | KFC, biscuit | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 358 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | KFC, biscuit has 298% more |
| Protein | 7.5 g ★ | 2.01 g | KFC, biscuit has 273% more |
| Carbs | 43.55 g ★ | 20.71 g | KFC, biscuit has 110% more |
| Fat | 17.05 g | 0.15 g ★ | KFC, biscuit has 11267% more |
| Fiber | 2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sugar | 4.04 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 38% more |
| Sodium | 1070 mg | 36 mg ★ | KFC, biscuit has 2872% more |
| Calcium | 55 mg ★ | 38 mg | KFC, biscuit has 45% more |
| Iron | 2.86 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | KFC, biscuit has 314% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 115 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.