KFC, Coleslaw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
KFC, Coleslaw
0 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
11 wins
| Nutrient | KFC, Coleslaw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 144 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | KFC, Coleslaw has 60% more |
| Protein | 0.91 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Carbs | 15.65 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
| Fat | 8.64 g | 0.15 g ★ | KFC, Coleslaw has 5660% more |
| Fiber | 2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sugar | 13.54 g | 6.48 g ★ | KFC, Coleslaw has 109% more |
| Sodium | 189 mg | 36 mg ★ | KFC, Coleslaw has 425% more |
| Calcium | 28 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more |
| Iron | 0.21 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Vitamin C | 14.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more |
| Potassium | 140 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.