KFC, Crispy Chicken Strips vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
KFC, Crispy Chicken Strips
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | KFC, Crispy Chicken Strips | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 274 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | KFC, Crispy Chicken Strips has 204% more |
| Protein | 20.25 g ★ | 2.01 g | KFC, Crispy Chicken Strips has 907% more |
| Carbs | 13.66 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
| Fat | 15.42 g | 0.15 g ★ | KFC, Crispy Chicken Strips has 10180% more |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 948 mg | 36 mg ★ | KFC, Crispy Chicken Strips has 2533% more |
| Calcium | 25 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
| Iron | 0.69 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Equal |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 333 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.