Kielbasa, fully cooked, unheated vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Kielbasa, fully cooked, unheated
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Kielbasa, fully cooked, unheated | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 325 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Kielbasa, fully cooked, unheated has 261% more |
| Protein | 10.84 g ★ | 2.01 g | Kielbasa, fully cooked, unheated has 439% more |
| Carbs | 3.72 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Fat | 29.63 g | 0.15 g ★ | Kielbasa, fully cooked, unheated has 19653% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 2.05 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Sodium | 928 mg | 36 mg ★ | Kielbasa, fully cooked, unheated has 2478% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more |
| Iron | 0.75 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Kielbasa, fully cooked, unheated has 9% more |
| Vitamin C | 19.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Potassium | 217 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.