Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 226 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked has 88% more |
| Protein | 13.1 g ★ | 4.4 g | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked has 198% more |
| Carbs | 3.9 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 82% more |
| Fat | 17.6 g | 1.92 g ★ | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked has 817% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1200 mg | 7 mg ★ | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked has 17043% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Iron | 1.24 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 17% more |
| Vitamin C | 14.8 mg ★ | 0 mg | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked has 0% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.