Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 226 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked has 151% more |
| Protein | 13.1 g ★ | 2.01 g | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked has 552% more |
| Carbs | 3.9 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Fat | 17.6 g | 0.15 g ★ | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked has 11633% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1200 mg | 36 mg ★ | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked has 3233% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 1.24 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked has 80% more |
| Vitamin C | 14.8 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.