Lamb, New Zealand, imported, kidney, cooked, soaked and fried vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, kidney, cooked, soaked and fried
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, kidney, cooked, soaked and fried | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 112 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 7% more |
| Protein | 19.78 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, kidney, cooked, soaked and fried has 350% more |
| Carbs | 0.18 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 99% more |
| Fat | 3.56 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, kidney, cooked, soaked and fried has 85% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 199 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, kidney, cooked, soaked and fried has 2743% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 47% more |
| Iron | 14.7 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, kidney, cooked, soaked and fried has 887% more |
| Potassium | 271 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, kidney, cooked, soaked and fried has 58% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.