Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, raw
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 19% more |
| Protein | 20.2 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 359% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 6.88 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 258% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 65 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 829% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Iron | 1.16 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 22% more |
| Potassium | 325 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 89% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.