Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Nuts, almonds
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
1 wins
🏆
Nuts, almonds
9 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Nuts, almonds | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 674 kcal | 579 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 16% more |
| Protein | 5.24 g | 21.15 g ★ | Nuts, almonds has 75% more |
| Carbs | 0.62 g | 21.55 g ★ | Nuts, almonds has 97% more |
| Fat | 72.28 g | 49.93 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 45% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 12.5 g ★ | Nuts, almonds has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 4.35 g | Nuts, almonds has 100% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg | 1 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 4200% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 269 mg ★ | Nuts, almonds has 98% more |
| Iron | 0.7 mg | 3.71 mg ★ | Nuts, almonds has 81% more |
| Potassium | 164 mg | 733 mg ★ | Nuts, almonds has 78% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.